First Amendment

Let me begin by expressing my hope that you, dear blog reader, will recognize and appreciate the clarity of thought and moral courage it has required to publish this historic message. It will be unpopular among the selfish and shallow thinkers (all Libertarians, most Republicans and three Democrats), but it is time for WE, THE INTELLIGENTSIA, to shoulder the responsibility that accompanies the extraordinary intelligence with which the Big Bang has endowed us. We must speak out, letting the chips fall where they may.

The first amendment to the US Constitution seems innocuous enough at first reading:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

What our founders failed to realize is that there are millions of emotionally and/or behaviorally challenged among us who may be unduly influenced to the point of violence by the critical remarks of others. These unstable unfortunates (referred to in a less-enlightened era simply as lunatics, whackos or nutjobs) may be inadvertently set off by negative or critical remarks about anything!

Let’s face it, as long as the Emotionally/Behaviorally Challenged (EBC) are among us, free speech is evil. Let us patriotic Americans turn at last to the advice good American mothers have given their children for centuries: “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all”. We must, as responsible citizens, limit our speech to being positive and non-critical. Criticizing or complaining must be recognized for the criminal act that it really is. It is time to correct the lack of vision and foresight exhibited by those who concocted the obviously obsolete document we call The Constitution (who did not understand the delicate sensibilities of the EBC and probably referred to them as “teched in the head”). Amend the First Amendment!!!!

With this blog, I am calling on our courageous Protectors in congress to step forward and co-sponsor a bill to add just one tiny little phrase to the current wording of the First Amendment: “positive, non-critical and upbeat” just prior to the word “speech”. Thus the amended amendment would read:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of positive, non critical and upbeat speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

This very clever constitutional strategy effectively circumvents the archaic, tedious and needlessly expensive process required for amending the Constitution itself. I am assured by a highly respected (but anonymous by his request) Constitutional scholar (a Harvard graduate, for gosh sakes!), that this is the quickest and most effective way to address this “critical problem” (pardon the pun): Don’t amend the Constitution, simply amend the amendment! The constitution is silent on this subject, so all that is required to accomplish this urgent change is a simple majority of Congress (and everyone knows the majority of Congress is simple.)

{ 3 comments }

{ 0 comments }

Cass Sunstein is President Barak Obama’s radical anti-hunting, anti-gun, pro-animal rights professor of law nominee for “Regulatory Czar”. The following are Mr. Sunstein’s opinions in his own words.

2004 book Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions
“Animals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives…”

Cass Sunstein, Regulatory Czar currently serving under President Obama, gives his views on hunting, animal slavery & right to bear arms.

Cass Sunstein, arguing for a Fairness Doctrine for the Internet in his book, Republic.com 2.0 (page 137).
“A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government.”

Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People’s Organs Without Explicit Consent
Cass Sunstein, President Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has advocated a policy under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to having his or her organs removed for transplantation into someone else when they die unless that person has explicitly indicated that his or her organs should not be taken. Under such a policy, hospitals would harvest organs from people who never gave permission for this to be done.

Here are more quotes by Mr. Sunstein:
Cass Sunstein Quotes

Contact Your U.S. Senators

In the 1997 movie, “Liar, Liar”, actor Jim Carey’s, character, Fletcher Reede is arguing a case in court when his opponent makes a very good point he objects:

Fletcher: Your honor, I object!
Judge: Why?
Fletcher: Because it’s devastating to my case!

Liberals cannot argue the substance of issues because their policies make no sense. When questioned about these policies they resort to any number of strategies:

1. Insulting the questioner’s intelligence
2. Calling the questioner names
3. Discrediting the questioner
4. Rambling
5. Violence
6. Denying any opposing voice

First case in point, CIA Director James Woolsey evades questions on the Iraq war by insulting Jan Helfeld:

California Democrat Rep. Pete Stark is an expert in these callow tactics. Here is what Michelle Malkin has to say about the congressman:

——-Foul Language Warning——–

Longtime readers of this blog are well aware of California Democrat Rep. Pete Stark (Raving Mad)’s unhingedness.

He has called a Republican opponent a “c**ksucker”, left a profanity-laced message on a constituent’s voicemail, and suggested on the floor of the House that Republicans are sending men and women to Iraq “to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.”

He’s an unrepentant basket case — and everything that’s wrong with Washington.

Here’s fresh proof from an independent TV documentarian Jan Helfeld, whose Socratic interviewing techniques cause Stark to engage in another trademark tirade. Helfeld asks Stark about the national debt and the economy. Stark tells him repeatedly to “shut up,” sneers at Helfeld’s lack of an advanced economic degree, and ends the interview by bolting from his chair and telling Helfeld to “Get the f**k out of here or I’ll throw you out the window:”

This next example is of self-appointed funny guy, judge of intelligence, and bestower of labels, Bill Maher.

Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid provides so many examples of these school-yard tactics.

harry-reid

thehill.com reports the following:

Town hall protesters are “evil-mongers,” says Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.)

Reid coined the term in a speech to an energy conference in Las Vegas this week and repeated it in an interview with Politics Daily.

Such “evil-mongers” are using “lies, innuendo and rumor,” to drown out rational debate, Reid said.

CNN correspondent Susan Roesgen and Janine Garofalo bash tea party participants nationwide:

Here Congressman Charlie Rangel insults Governor Sarah Palin:

Here is another example from Senator Reid, this time rambling:

I wonder what Bill Maher would say about Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid.

In this video Glenn Beck shows how the left-leaning media works to try to marginalize and silence those opposed to ObamaCare.

Finally, the liberals show us the “proper” way to express an opposing view: