From the category archives:

Communism

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 3 comments }

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

In a politicalmavens.com editorial entitled “An absolute disgrace” author, William Katz gives voice to the question on the minds of many thinking Americans:

President Obama has been awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize…On the basis of what?

He continues:

The Nobel Peace Prize has always been a bit of a joke. It has been given to a number of shady characters, like Yassir Arafat and Jimmah Carter.

But this one, so to speak, takes the prize. It will be waved in the face of Obama’s opponents. Here, see, America is back! Back to appease.

Later, he gives evidence of what appears to be the real agenda of the historically leftist prize committee:

In 2002, when the prize was given to Carter, a member of the selection committee openly said that it was a “kick in the shins” to George W. Bush. That was a year after the 9-11 attacks, and Bush was trying to defend the United States against further outrages.

This is another kick in the shins to Bush, but, more important, it is a kick in the shins to that part of America that still believes we have work to do in the war on terror, and believes that the first responsibility of the president is to protect the nation.

Mr Katz asks the question:

How can a man who’s just won the Nobel Peace Prize send 40,000 troops to Afghanistan? How does he send them before he goes to Oslo to pick up the certificate and make a “peace” speech?

He then observes:

Barack Obama, already a supreme egotist, will see himself more and more as above the office of president of the United States.

This, of course, makes Mr. Obama even more dangerous to the interests of the country that he is sworn to protect and defend:

The author then concludes:

Let us hope Americans catch on, and realize the hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty of the moment.

Let us see it for the bad joke that it is.

Many of us have caught on, alright. Could it be that our allies in Europe have become “The Islamic States of Europe”? Could the world “leftist” agenda be synonymous with the anti-Israeli agenda that apparently guides the Obama administration? Could our country actually be in the hands of an Islamist? Could this explain the apparent anti-American policy of the our current administration?

Read the complete editorial here:
An absolute disgrace

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

Liberal Logic. Michael Moore. Each an alliterative phrase. One an oxymoron and the other a moron of another type.

Michael Moore, champion of the working class used a non-union crew to film his new documentary, “Capitalism: A Love Story”. A movie in which Moore, who makes his fortune from his movie and book sales, attacks capitalism. Isn’t there a word for this? Perhaps a few…

Sources:
Michael Moore, ‘Champion’ of Working Class, Slammed for Using Non-Union Workers

Review: ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 1 comment }

It seems that a pillar of the Obamagenda is the redistribution of wealth. To be fair, I admit he warned us of this during his campaign. However, as one who has worked all his life to earn a living, I find this concept abhorrent.  I consider myself to be in good company in this matter.  Thomas Jefferson himself observed:  “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”  That my friends is just common sense.

However, if Mr. Obama would confiscate what I have earned to give to others of his choosing, I beseech him to refrain from the ruse of first running the seized funds through huge socialist, government-run programs.  There, of course, bureaucrats, legislators, politicians, insiders and just plain thieves each siphon off their chunk leaving the remainder to to be sifted through the inefficiencies inherent in any government run program.  The result is that the supposed beneficiaries of Mr. Obama’s generosity receive only the dross that dribbles out the other end and I am left wondering why I work so hard.

Skip the pitiful attempt to legitimize this armed robbery by forced taxation! Give them the grass Mr. President, not the horse crap that results when you process the grass through the government horse!

Why ruin the economy of a perfectly good nation and condemn it to the historical scrap heap of failed socialist states a few decades hence?

Just give ‘em the flippin’ grass!

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }