From the category archives:

Choose Life

After much anticipation, the controversial pro-life commercial from Focus on the Family featuring Heisman trophy Tim Tebow and his mom has aired.

Before the commercial was even released, the National Organization for Women (NOW) issued a call to action to write CBS in protest over the ad stating that it is “extraordinarily offensive and demeaning.”

In an exclusive video with radaronline.com, also before the commercial aired, lawyer Gloria Allred threatens to sue CBS over the ad claiming it was “misleading” and contained “factual inconsistencies.”

Here is the ad:
Focus on the Family Super Bowl Commercial with Tim Tebow

In response to the ad, NOW president Terry O’Neill tells the Los Angeles Times “I am blown away at the celebration of the violence against women in it,” she said. “That’s what comes across to me even more strongly than the anti-abortion message. I myself am a survivor of domestic violence, and I don’t find it charming. I think CBS should be ashamed of itself.”

Ironically, NOW says nothing about the Snicker’s commercial that aired during the Super Bowl which features Betty White also being tackled.

Sources:

Focus on the Family

Just a Regular Guy

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

Uproar over pro-life Super Bowl ad featuring Tim Tebow

Please visit Behar: Tebow Could Have Just as Easily Been ‘Racist Pedophile’ to hear the deep thoughts of “The View” regarding this issue.

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

This was just released from the GOP Leader Press Office

Health care reform should not be used as an opportunity to use federal funds to pay for elective abortions. Health reform should be an opportunity to protect human life – not end it.

Unfortunately, Speaker Pelosi’s 2,032-page government takeover of health care does just that. On line 17, p. 110, section 222 under “Abortions for which Public Funding is Allowed” the Health and Human Services Secretary is given the authority to determine when abortion is allowed under the government-run plan. The Speaker’s plan also requires that at least one insurance plan offered in the Exchange covers abortions.

What is even more alarming is that a monthly abortion premium will be charged of all enrollees in the government-run plan. It’s right there on line 16, page 96,
section 213, under “Insurance Rating Rules.” The premium will be paid into a U.S. Treasury account – and these federal funds will be used to pay for the abortion services.

Section 213 describes the process in which the Health Benefits Commissioner is to assess the monthly premiums that will be used to pay for elective abortions under the government-run plan. The Commissioner must charge at a minimum $1 per enrollee per month.

A majority of Americans believe that health care plans should not be mandated to provide elective abortion coverage, and a majority of Americans do not believe government health care plans should include abortion coverage. Currently, federal appropriations bills include language known as the Hyde Amendment that prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for elective abortions under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, while another provision, known as the Smith Amendment, prohibits federal funding of abortion under the federal employees’ health benefits plan.

Speaker Pelosi’s 2,032-page health care monstrosity is an affront to the American people and drastically moves away from current policy. The American people deserve more from their government than being forced to pay for abortion.

House Republicans are offering a common-sense, responsible solution that would reduce health care costs and expand access while protecting the dignity of all human life. The Republican plan, available at HealthCare.GOP.gov, would codify the Hyde Amendment and prohibit all authorized and appropriated federal funds from being used to pay for abortion. And under the Republican plan, any health plan that includes abortion coverage may not receive federal funds.


Source

Speaker Pelosi’s Government-Run Health Plan Will Require a Monthly Abortion Premium

You can track the healthcare bill here: H.R.3962: Affordable Health Care for America Act

More Health care Coverage on Liberty’s Army

Contact Your U.S. Representative

Contact Your U.S. Senators

“In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” ~ George Orwell

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 0 comments }

We came across several stories in our ceaseless search for important news that demonstrate our society’s moral decline. Immorality has always existed but it has not always been accepted. Over the years the media’s relentless and ubiquitous in-your-face assault on everything decent has numbed us all to things that were once unacceptable.

Kevin Jennings, the founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, was teaching high school in Concord, Mass., in 1988 when the boy, a sophomore, confessed an involvement with a man he had met in a bus station bathroom in Boston. Jennings has written that he told the boy, “I hope you knew to use a condom.”

In a statement issued Wednesday, President Obama’s Director of the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools Kevin Jennings responded to critics calling for Jennings to step down:

Twenty one years later I can see how I should have handled this situation differently. I should have asked for more information and consulted legal or medical authorities.

“Teachers back then had little training or guidance about this kind of thing,” Jennings said. “All teachers should have a basic level of preparedness. I would like to see the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools play a bigger role in helping to prepare teachers.”

“I should have handled this situation differently” You think?

“Teachers back then had little training or guidance about this kind of thing”. Who needs training on this? How about common sense and a sense of decency? The first reaction of people I know would have been to call the police and get help for the student. How difficult is that to figure out?

We might be more sympathetic if Mr Jennings had not been continually boasting about his handling of the incident and the positive effect he had on this young man’s life,  in his published  book as well as  in his talks before gay audiences.  We might be, but I doubt it.

Speaking of difficult things to figure out, Toys”R”Us spokesperson, Whoopi Goldberg, defended child rapist and hollywood filmmaker, Roman Polanski.

Claiming that he wanted to photograph 13-year old Samantha Geimer, Polanski, then 43, plied the girl with champagne and drugs and then, despite her repeated refusals and requests to go home, he raped her.

“I know it wasn’t ‘rape’ rape. I think it was something else, but I don’t believe it was ‘rape’ rape,” said Ms. Goldberg on ABC’s (owned by Disney) The View.

Perhaps Toys”R”Us should “fire” fire their spokesperson.  Perhaps we should fire Toys “R” Us as well as Disney.

Disney also owns the ABC Family Channel whose tagline is “A New Kind of Family”.

Meanwhile, Newsweek reporter, Katie Connolly decries Senator Orrin Hatch’s call to reinstate federal funding for abstinence-only sex education:

Let’s face it. Teenagers are going to have sex. They always have, they always will. Sure there will be a decent number of teens who choose to abstain and they should feel supported in that decision, but there will still be a large chunk of teenagers doing the dirty. Making them stop is a fools errand. It’s about as likely a seeing the Pope in a speedo. It’s like asking the Queen to declare her hatred for corgis. It’s not going to happen. Sex education policies should take into account this basic reality and tailor programs that broadly educate teens about their choices, abstinence included. Policies should be set up to work. Anything else is just pointless moralizing.

These casual and fatalistic views have been destroying our way of life and will result in our undoing. Before there were ever governments to rule “civilized” society, there were families consisting of a mother, father, and children. We don’t need a “new kind of family”.

Sources:
Obama’s ‘Safe Schools’ Czar Admits He Poorly Handled Underage Sex Case

Toys”R”Us Spokeswoman Defends Child Rape

Abstinence-Only Education is Back

[Caution: contains explicit reference to sexual acts which may disturb some readers]
Polanski Crime Worse Than People Know

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 1 comment }

www.JewishWorldReview.com Published this article entitled “What lies beneath” By Cal Thomas. It explores the deeper issues that divide the left and right concerning health care reform:

The debate — OK, the shouting match — we are having over “health-care reform” is about many things, including cost, who gets help and who does not and who, or what, gets to make that determination. Underlying it all is a larger question: Is human life something special? Is it to be valued more highly than, say, plants and pets? When someone is in a “persistent vegetative state” do we mean to say that person is equal in value to a carrot?

Are we now assigning worth to human life, or does it arrive with its own pre-determined value, irrespective of race, class, IQ, or disability?

The bottom line is not the bottom line. It is something far more profound. Our decisions regarding who will get help and who won’t are about more than bean-counting bureaucrats deciding if your drugs or operation will cost more than you are contributing to the U.S. Treasury.

The secular left claims we are evolutionary accidents who managed to crawl out of the slime and by “natural selection” stand erect and over millions of years outsmart our ancestors, the apes. If that is your belief, then you probably think health care should be rationed. Why spend lots of money to improve — or save — the life of someone who evolved from slime and has no special significance other than the “accident” of becoming human? Policies flow from such a philosophy, though the average secularist probably wouldn’t put it in such stark terms. Stark, or not, isn’t this the inevitable progression of seeing humanity as maybe complex, but nothing special?

The opposing view sees human beings as unique creations. Even Thomas Jefferson, identified by historians as a Deist who doubted the existence of a personal G-d, understood that if certain rights (life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness) do not come from a source beyond the reach of the state, then the state could take those rights away. Those who believe that G-d made us and also makes the rules about our existence and our behavior will have a completely different understanding of life’s value and our approach to affirming it until natural death.

It is between these two distinctly different worldview goalposts that the battle is taking place. Few from the “endowed rights” side are saying that a 100-year-old with an inoperable brain tumor should be given extraordinary and expensive care to keep the heart pumping, even after brain waves have gone flat. But there is a big difference between “letting go” and “snuffing out.” The unnatural progression for many on the secular left is to see such a person as a “burden.” In an age when we think we should be free of burdens — a notion that contributes to our superficiality and makes us morally obtuse — getting rid of granny might seem perfectly rational, even defensible. But by doing so, we assume an even greater burden: the role of G-d in deciding who gets to live and who must die. Anyone who has seen the film “Bruce Almighty” senses how difficult it is to play G-d.

We are now witnessing some of the consequences of attempting to ban people with a G-d perspective from the public square. If there are no rules and no one to whom one might appeal when those rules are violated, we are on our own to set whatever rules we wish and to change them in a moment in response to opinion polls. Any appeals to a higher authority stop at the Supreme Court.

The explosive town hall meetings are indications that Americans are trusting government less and less. So where should we go? The answer is in your wallet or purse. It’s on the money. Right now it is little more than a slogan, but what if it became true: in G-d We Trust.

Health care is NOT just a economic  issue, it is a moral issue. The chasm that divides us is as deep as it gets. Let there be no “Roe Vs Wade” type edict that prevents any US citizen from pursuing life, liberty and happiness.  All human beings deserve the “right to choose” whether or not to receive treatment.  The government proposes to approach this as an economic decision.  It is so much more!  There must be no government involvement in that important choice.

Read the article here:
What lies beneath



You can track the healthcare bill here: H.R.3200: America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009

More Health care Coverage on Liberty’s Army

Contact Your U.S. Representative

Contact Your U.S. Senators

In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

Share This With Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Mixx
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine

{ 2 comments }

A Baby Must Do a Lot of Trusting

Family

Have you ever held a newborn in your arms and felt it snuggle into your warmth as if seeking refuge? What a wonderful feeling! A precious, innocent little life depending entirely on your strength to protect it from the real world!

Can you imagine the shock a little one must feel when it leaves the ultimate protection of its mother’s womb and emerges into the cold, blindingly bright world for the first time? All of a sudden the baby is cold, feels hunger, and must fend for itself in the oxygen department. The warm, loving, and nourishing darkness that the baby has instinctively trusted without question, and has come to take for granted for the past nine months is gone! It is replaced by what you see around you.

Is life viable for him or her without the commitment of a loving parent or parents? Of course not! The little one must continue in a state of complete dependence for its basic NEEDS for several years. Warmth, nourishment, shelter, love, touch and knowledge will all come from someone who is totally committed to caring for the child if they are to come at all.

Watch closely, as the baby begins do develop judgment over time. It learns that it cannot blindly trust everyone to cherish it like Mom or Dad does. Some people are too rough or too negligent or too ignorant to be completely trusted. This developing discernment is essential to the child’s ultimate survival and transition to adulthood.

Thank God for the wise plan that makes it possible for us to take our needs for granted for the first nine months of our existence, as we are surrounded by the protecting warmth of our mother’s love. This applies to you, me and everyone else who has lived on the earth.

From the time when we first existed as a few newly conceived cells (each cell carrying the complete DNA blueprint for our future development and growth) through the first 21 days till our tiny hearts started beating, we were hardly recognizable as a baby. Then, things started happening quickly. Two more weeks and our brains start to generate brainwaves indicating our first cognitive activity. Four to five weeks more, we are sucking our thumbs (getting a head start on our suckling skills!), moving around (sometimes vigorously!), adjusting position to get more comfortable, squinting to close out light, frowning (perhaps a smile or two also?), moving our tiny tongues and swallowing.

Ahhh, life is good! We are in a good place! We take all this for granted, for we are not intended to worry at this tender point in our development. There is simply nothing to worry about here! Of course, with hindsight, we know this is about to change! But, for now, we have big job to do. We have to be and learn. That’s it! Nature and mommy will do the rest! I feel certain we would be surprised at all the things we learned while we were in the womb.

Most of all we learned to trust. It was as if we knew there was someone doing all the work. From inside, we could actually feel the love of our mother as she provided for all our needs. Thank heavens, that didn’t change much for most of us after we emerged into the real world.

Some babies were a bit premature on the trust, however. For over FORTY MILLION! (40,000,000), babies since 1973, their tiny lives ended in a flood of betrayal, bewilderment, shock and pain. Horrible unbearable pain.

I was looking at Abortion Statistics the other day. So cold and clinical they chilled me to the bone. Each baby had become a number and was classified by the method used to end its life. There were three classifications of methods. Curettage was by far the most common according to the Center for Disease Control accounting for over 99%. Abortion Statistics – United States. There were two general classifications of curettage used:

  • “Sharp”: Insertion through the cervix which has been mechanically dialated of a hook shaped knife (curette) which cuts the baby into pieces. The pieces are scraped out through the cervix and discarded. Imagine you are a trusting child feeling safe in your mother’s love and all of a sudden, something is going on! There is an inordinate amount of light, strange sounds and then the knife begins its work. Don’t worry, little one, this is not only your first experience with horrible pain it will be your last and it will all be over soon. Society has convinced your mommy it is ok to choose this for you…sorry…

  • “Suction”: A tube with an extremely sharp-edged end is inserted into the womb, then hooked up to a vacuum device. The vacuum suction, nearly 30 times as powerful as your vacuum cleaner, tears the fetus and placenta into small pieces which are sucked through the tube into a bottle and discarded. Imagine the fright at the horrible noise and the pain and horror as your tiny body is torn apart and sucked into the maelstrom piece by piece…

  • Today, we look back on our ancestors and wonder how could they have been so arrogant, cruel and ignorant to think that they could actually own another human being? For most of us slavery is an incomprehensible, shameful blot on the otherwise glorious history of the land of the free…

    We recall more recently the stark, incomprehensible horror of “The Holocaust” and can’t help but wonder how the German Nation could have allowed such an abomination to exist within its expanded borders. Generations of good German people have had to live with similar thoughts when the lights go out before they sleep.

    What will our descendants feel towards us, their ancestors, when they look back on the period where we as a people have tolerated what has to be the most horrible abomination ever committed by an “enlightened” nation in the history of planet earth?

    Our President seeks “dialogue” on this matter. He takes the horror a huge step forward in supporting “partial birth abortions”. How can we have a dialogue on this? This is simply infanticide disguised as the divine principle of human free agency, the right to choose. I pray for the millions of young men and women who have been duped into this crime against humanity. I pray they can forgive themselves when the light finally comes on, and it will… If only they had realized that when you choose an act, you also choose the consequences!

    Please understand, I dont condemn the prospective mothers who must ultimately face this terrible decision alone. Nor is this aimed at irresponsible men who have their fun then leave a young woman alone to face the consequences. This is an indictment of our society for tolerating the carnage.

    When our nation finally removes the blinders and sees this for the horrible abomination it is, there will be change. There will be shame enough for all of us to go around. And, don’t expect our descendants to understand and forgive. They never will.

    Share This With Friends:
    • Print
    • email
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Digg
    • StumbleUpon
    • RSS
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Live
    • Yahoo! Bookmarks
    • MySpace
    • Mixx
    • Netvibes
    • NewsVine

    { 2 comments }